Parent Categories
Constitutional Law
-
Let God Sort Them Out? Refining the Individualization Requirement in Capital Sentencing
January 25, 2024
Carol S. Steiker & Jordan M. Steiker, Let God Sort Them Out? Refining the Individualization Requirement in Capital Sentencing, 102 Yale L.J. 835 (1992) (reviewing…
-
Of Cities, Rainforests, and Frogs: A Response to Allen and Rosenberg
January 25, 2024
Carol S. Steiker, Of Cities, Rainforests, and Frogs: A Response to Allen and Rosenberg, 72 St. John’s L. Rev. 1203 (1998).
-
Solving Some Due Process Puzzles: A Response to Jerold Israel
January 25, 2024
Carol S. Steiker, Solving Some Due Process Puzzles: A Response to Jerold Israel, 45 St. Louis U. L.J. 445 (2001).
-
Panetti v. Quarterman: Is There a “Rational Understanding” of the Supreme Court’s Eighth Amendment Jurisprudence
January 25, 2024
Carol S. Steiker, Panetti v. Quarterman: Is There a “Rational Understanding” of the Supreme Court’s Eighth Amendment Jurisprudence, 5 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 285…
-
Atkins v. Virginia: Lessons from Substance and Procedure in the Constitutional Regulation of Capital Punishment
January 25, 2024
Carol S. Steiker & Jordan M. Steiker, Atkins v. Virginia: Lessons from Substance and Procedure in the Constitutional Regulation of Capital Punishment, 57 DePaul L.
-
Opening a Window or Building a Wall? The Effect of Death Penalty Law and Advocacy on Criminal Justice More Broadly
January 25, 2024
Carol S. Steiker & Jordan M. Steiker, Opening a Window or Building a Wall? The Effect of Death Penalty Law and Advocacy on Criminal Justice…
-
Carol S. Steiker, Brandeis in Olmstead: “Our Government is the Potent, the Omnipresent Teacher”, 79 Miss. L.J. 149 (2009).
-
Courting Death: The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment
January 25, 2024
Carol S. Steiker & Jordan M. Steiker, Courting Death: The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment (Harvard Univ. Press 2016).
-
Counter-Revolution in Constitutional Criminal Procedure?
January 25, 2024
Carol Steiker, Counter-Revolution in Constitutional Criminal Procedure?, 20 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 435 (1997).
-
“How Much Justice Can You Afford?” A Response to Stuntz
January 25, 2024
Carol S. Steiker, “How Much Justice Can You Afford?” A Response to Stuntz, 67 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1290 (1999).
-
Carol S. Steiker, Raising the Bar: Maples v. Thomas and the Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel, 127 Harv. L. Rev. 468 (2013).
-
Richard D. Friedman, Christopher B. Mueller & Charles Nesson, Crawford, Davis & the Right of Confrontation: Where Do We Go from Here?, 19 Regent U.
-
The Day the Internet Met the First Amendment: Time and the Communications Decency Act
January 25, 2024
Charles Nesson & David Marglin, The Day the Internet Met the First Amendment: Time and the Communications Decency Act, 10 Harv. J. L. & Tech.
-
The Confrontation Clause: Get Raleigh Right – Overrule Crawford
January 25, 2024
Fern L. Nesson & Charles R. Nesson, The Confrontation Clause: Get Raleigh Right – Overrule Crawford (June 17, 2019).
-
The Fifth Amendment Privilege Against Cross-Examination
January 25, 2024
Charles R. Nesson & Michael J. Leotta, The Fifth Amendment Privilege Against Cross-Examination, 85 Geo. L.J. 1627 (1997).
-
The Image of Justice: Chandler v. Florida
January 25, 2024
Charles R. Nesson & Andrew D. Koblenz, The Image of Justice: Chandler v. Florida, 16 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 405 (1981).
-
The Constitutional Approach to Money: Monetary Design and the Production of the Modern World
January 25, 2024
Christine A. Desan, The Constitutional Approach to Money: Monetary Design and the Production of the Modern World, in Money Talks 109 (Nina Bandelj, Frederick F.
-
Unpacking DHS’s Troubling Explanation of the Portland Van Video
January 25, 2024
Andrew Manuel Crespo, Unpacking DHS’s Troubling Explanation of the Portland Van Video, Lawfare (July 25, 2020).
-
Andrew Manuel Crespo, The Unavoidably Empirical Fourth Amendment: A Case Study of Kansas v. Glover, 1 Cts. & Just. L.J. 217 (2019).
-
Brief of Professor Andrew Manuel Crespo as Amicus Curiae in Support of Affirmance, Kansas v. Glover
January 25, 2024
Andrew Manuel Crespo, Brief of Professor Andrew Manuel Crespo as Amicus Curiae in Support of Affirmance, Kansas v. Glover (No. 18-556), 2019 WL 4256217 (U.S.,…
-
Systemic Facts: Toward Institutional Awareness in Criminal Courts
January 25, 2024
Andrew Manuel Crespo, Systemic Facts: Toward Institutional Awareness in Criminal Courts, 129 Harv. L. Rev. 2117 (2016).