Parent Categories
Constitutional Law
-
The American Death Penalty: Alternative Model for Ordinary Criminal Justice or Exception that Justifies the Rule?
July 14, 2026
Carol S. Steiker & Jordan M. Steiker, The American Death Penalty: Alternative Model for Ordinary Criminal Justice or Exception that Justifies the Rule?, 22 New…
-
Abolishing the American Death Penalty: The Court of Public Opinion Versus the U.S. Supreme Court
July 14, 2026
Carol S. Steiker & Jordan M. Steiker, Abolishing the American Death Penalty: The Court of Public Opinion Versus the U.S. Supreme Court, 51 Val. U.
-
Two Cheers For Miranda
July 14, 2026
Carol S. Steiker, Two Cheers For Miranda, 97, B.U. L. Rev. 1197 (2017).
-
Let God Sort Them Out? Refining the Individualization Requirement in Capital Sentencing
July 14, 2026
Carol S. Steiker & Jordan M. Steiker, Let God Sort Them Out? Refining the Individualization Requirement in Capital Sentencing, 102 Yale L.J. 835 (1992) (reviewing…
-
Note: The Constitutional Status of Sexual Orientation: Homosexuality as a Suspect Classification
July 14, 2026
Carol S. Steiker, Note: The Constitutional Status of Sexual Orientation: Homosexuality as a Suspect Classification, 98 Harv. L. Rev. 1285 (1985).
-
Sober Second Thoughts: Reflections on Two Decades of Constitutional Regulation of Capital Punishment
July 14, 2026
Carol S. Steiker & Jordan M. Steiker, Sober Second Thoughts: Reflections on Two Decades of Constitutional Regulation of Capital Punishment, 109 Harv. L. Rev. 355…
-
Carol S. Steiker, Of Cities, Rainforests, and Frogs: A Response to Allen and Rosenberg, 72 St. John’s L. Rev. 1203 (1998).
-
Carol S. Steiker, Solving Some Due Process Puzzles: A Response to Jerold Israel, 45 St. Louis U. L.J. 445 (2001).
-
Panetti v. Quarterman: Is There a “Rational Understanding” of the Supreme Court’s Eighth Amendment Jurisprudence
July 14, 2026
Carol S. Steiker, Panetti v. Quarterman: Is There a “Rational Understanding” of the Supreme Court’s Eighth Amendment Jurisprudence, 5 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 285…
-
Atkins v. Virginia: Lessons from Substance and Procedure in the Constitutional Regulation of Capital Punishment
July 14, 2026
Carol S. Steiker & Jordan M. Steiker, Atkins v. Virginia: Lessons from Substance and Procedure in the Constitutional Regulation of Capital Punishment, 57 DePaul L.
-
Opening a Window or Building a Wall? The Effect of Death Penalty Law and Advocacy on Criminal Justice More Broadly
July 14, 2026
Carol S. Steiker & Jordan M. Steiker, Opening a Window or Building a Wall? The Effect of Death Penalty Law and Advocacy on Criminal Justice…
-
Carol S. Steiker, Brandeis in Olmstead: “Our Government is the Potent, the Omnipresent Teacher”, 79 Miss. L.J. 149 (2009).
-
Courting Death: The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment
July 14, 2026
Carol S. Steiker & Jordan M. Steiker, Courting Death: The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment (Harvard Univ. Press 2016).
-
Foreword: The Limits of the Preventive State
July 14, 2026
Carol S. Steiker, Foreword: The Limits of the Preventive State, 88 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 771 (1998).
-
Second Thoughts About First Principles
July 14, 2026
Carol S. Steiker, Second Thoughts About First Principles, 107 Harv. L. Rev. 820 (1994).
-
Counter-Revolution in Constitutional Criminal Procedure?
July 14, 2026
Carol Steiker, Counter-Revolution in Constitutional Criminal Procedure?, 20 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 435 (1997).
-
Carol S. Steiker, “First Principles” of Constitutional Criminal Procedure: A Mistake?, 112 Harv. L. Rev. 680 (1999)(reviewing Akhil Reed Amar, The Constitution and Criminal Procedure:…
-
Carol Steiker, Punishing Hateful Motives: Old Wine in a New Bottle Revives Calls for Prohibition, 97 Mich. L. Rev. 1857 (1999)(reviewing James B. Jacobs &…
-
“How Much Justice Can You Afford?” A Response to Stuntz
July 14, 2026
Carol S. Steiker, “How Much Justice Can You Afford?” A Response to Stuntz, 67 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1290 (1999).
-
Carol S. Steiker, Counter-Revolution in Constitutional Criminal Procedure? Two Audiences, Two Answers, 94 Mich. L. Rev. 2466 (1996).
-
Carol S. Steiker, Raising the Bar: Maples v. Thomas and the Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel, 127 Harv. L. Rev. 468 (2013).