Child Categories
Legal Theory & Philosophy
-
Review Essay: For Constitutionalism
December 4, 2024
Mark Tushnet, Review Essay: For Constitutionalism (Oct. 8, 2022) (reviewing Martin Loughlin, Against Constitutionalism (2022) and Roberto Gargarella, The Law as a Conversation Among Equals…
-
Mark Tushnet, The Dual State in the United States: The Case of Lynching and Legal Lynchings, 16 L. & Ethics Hum. Rts. 41 (2022).
-
Institutions for Protecting Constitutional Democracy: An Analytic Framework, with Special Reference to Electoral Management Bodies
December 4, 2024
Mark V. Tushnet, Institutions for Protecting Constitutional Democracy: An Analytic Framework, with Special Reference to Electoral Management Bodies, 16 Asian J. Comp. L. (Supplement) S10…
-
American Legal Realism Today: An Idiosyncratic Restatement
December 4, 2024
Mark V. Tushnet, American Legal Realism Today: An Idiosyncratic Restatement (Jan. 5, 2022).
-
Institutions for realizing popular constitutionalism
December 4, 2024
Mark V. Tushnet, Institutions for Realizing Popular Constitutionalism, 47 Revus: J. for Const. Theory & Phil. L. 1 (2022).
-
Music and Art
December 4, 2024
Mark Tushnet, Music and Art, in The Oxford Handbook of Freedom of Speech 431 (Adrienne Stone & Frederick Schauer eds., 2021).
-
Book Review: Constitutional and Political Theory: Selected Writings, Ernst-Wolfgag Böckenförde
December 4, 2024
Mark Tushnet, Book Review: Constitutional and Political Theory: Selected Writings, Ernst-Wolfgag Böckenförde (Mirjam Kunkler & Tine Stein eds., 2017), 24 Constellations 480 (2017).
-
Rule by Law or Rule of Law?
December 4, 2024
Mark Tushnet, Rule by Law or Rule of Law?, 22 Asia Pac. L. Rev. 79 (2014).
-
How Different are Waldron’s and Fallon’s Core Cases For and Against Judicial Review?
December 4, 2024
Mark Tushnet, How Different are Waldron’s and Fallon’s Core Cases For and Against Judicial Review?, 30 Oxford J. Legal Stud. 49 (2010).
-
From Environmental Foundations to Constitutional Structures: Learning from Nature’s Future
December 4, 2024
Laurence H. Tribe, From Environmental Foundations to Constitutional Structures: Learning from Nature’s Future, 84 Yale L.J. 545 (1975).
-
Balancing Versus Structured Decision Procedures: Antitrust, Title VII Disparate Impact, and Constitutional Law Strict Scrutiny
December 4, 2024
Louis Kaplow, Balancing Versus Structured Decision Procedures: Antitrust, Title VII Disparate Impact, and Constitutional Law Strict Scrutiny, 167 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1375 (2019).
-
Legal Advice About Acts Already Commited
December 4, 2024
Louis Kaplow & Steven Shavell, Legal Advice About Acts Already Committed, 10 Int’l Rev. L. & Econ. 149 (1990).
-
The Conflict Between Notions of Fairness and the Pareto Principle
December 4, 2024
Louis Kaplow & Steven Shavell, The Conflict Between Notions of Fairness and the Pareto Principle, 1 Am. L. & Econ. Rev. 63 (1999).
-
Steven Shavell & Louis Kaplow, Principles of Fairness Versus Human Welfare: On the Evaluation of Legal Policy (Harv. L. Sch. L. & Econ. Res. Paper…
-
Why Measure Inequality?
December 4, 2024
Louis Kaplow, Why Measure Inequality?, 3 J. Econ. Ineq. 65 (2005).
-
Louis Kaplow & Steven Shavell, Reply to Ripstein: Notes on Welfarist Versus Deontological Principles, 20 Econ. & Phil. 209 (2004).
-
Louis Kaplow & Steven Shavell, Any Non‐welfarist Method of Policy Assessment Violates the Pareto Principle, 109 J. Pol. Econ. 281 (2001).
-
Accuracy in the Determination of Liability
December 4, 2024
Louis Kaplow & Steven Shavell, Accuracy in the Determination of Liability, 37 J.L. & Econ. 1 (1994).
-
Accuracy in the assessment of damages
December 4, 2024
Louis Kaplow & Steven Shavell, Accuracy in the Assessment of Damages, 39 J.L. & Econ. 191 (1996).
-
Legal Advice About Information to Present in Litigation: Its Effects and Social Desirability
December 4, 2024
Steven Shavell & Louis Kaplow, Legal Advice About Information to Present in Litigation: Its Effects and Social Desirability, 102 Harv. L. Rev. 565 (1989).
-
Louis Kaplow & Steven Shavell, Any Non‐welfarist Method of Policy Assessment Violates the Pareto Principle: Reply, 112 J. Pol. Econ. 249 (2004).