Legal Theory & Philosophy

Adrian Vermeule & Cass R. Sunstein, Deterring Murder: A Reply, 58 Stan. L. Rev. 847 (2005).

Adrian Vermeule & Cass R. Sunstein, Is Capital Punishment Morally Required? Acts, Omissions and Life-Life Tradeoffs, 58 Stan. L. Rev. 703 (2005).

American Legal Realism (Morton J. Horwitz, William W. Fisher & Thomas A. Reed eds., Oxford Univ. Press 1993).

The Canon of American Legal Thought (David W. Kennedy & William W. Fisher eds., Princeton Univ. Press 2006).

Howell Jackson, Louis Kaplow, Steven Shavell, W. Kip Viscusi & David Cope, Analytical Methods for Lawyers (Found. Press 2003).

Louis Kaplow & Steven Shavell, Fairness Versus Welfare (Harvard Univ. Press 2002).

Louis Kaplow & Steven Shavell, Legal Advice About Acts Already Committed, 10 Int’l Rev. L. & Econ. 149 (1990).

Louis Kaplow & Steven Shavell, The Conflict Between Notions of Fairness and the Pareto Principle, 1 Am. L. & Econ. Rev. 63 (1999).

Louis Kaplow & Steven Shavell, Any Non-Individualistic Social Welfare Function Violates the Pareto Principle (Nat’l Bureau Econ. Res., Working Paper No. w7051, Mar. 1999).

Louis Kaplow & Steven Shavell, Human Nature and the Best Consequentialist Moral System (Harv. L. & Econ. Discussion Paper No. 349, Mar. 18, 2002).

Louis Kaplow & Steven Shavell, All Individuals May Be Made Worse Off Under Any Nonwelfarist Principle (Harv. L. & Econ. Discussion Paper No. 350, Feb.

Steven Shavell & Louis Kaplow, Principles of Fairness Versus Human Welfare: On the Evaluation of Legal Policy (Harv. L. Sch. L. & Econ. Res. Paper…

Howell E. Jackson, Louis Kaplow, Steven M. Shavell, W. Kip Viscusi & David Cope, Analytical Methods for Lawyers (Found. Press 2nd ed. 2010).

Louis Kaplow & Steven Shavell, Reply to Ripstein: Notes on Welfarist Versus Deontological Principles, 20 Econ. & Phil. 209 (2004).

Louis Kaplow & Steven Shavell, Any Non‐welfarist Method of Policy Assessment Violates the Pareto Principle, 109 J. Pol. Econ. 281 (2001).

Louis Kaplow & Steven Shavell, Accuracy in the Determination of Liability, 37 J.L. & Econ. 1 (1994).

Louis Kaplow & Steven Shavell, Accuracy in the Assessment of Damages, 39 J.L. & Econ. 191 (1996).

Steven Shavell & Louis Kaplow, Legal Advice About Information to Present in Litigation: Its Effects and Social Desirability, 102 Harv. L. Rev. 565 (1989).

Louis Kaplow & Steven Shavell, Any Non‐welfarist Method of Policy Assessment Violates the Pareto Principle: Reply, 112 J. Pol. Econ. 249 (2004).

Louis Kaplow & Steven Shavell, Comment, Do Liability Rules Facilitate Bargaining? A Reply to Ayres and Talley, 105 Yale L.J. 221 (1995).

Louis Kaplow & Steven Shavell, Optimal Law Enforcement with Self-Reporting of Behavior, 102 J. Pol. Econ. 583 (1994).

Louis Kaplow & Steven Shavell, Why the Legal System Is Less Efficient than the Income Tax in Redistributing Income, 23 J. Legal Stud. 667 (1994).

Louis Kaplow & Steven Shavell, Notions of Fairness versus the Pareto Principle: On the Role of Logical Consistency, 110 Yale L.J. 237 (2000).

Louis Kaplow & Steven Shavell, Private versus Socially Optimal Provision of Ex Ante Legal Advice, 8 J.L. Econ. & Org. 306 (1992).

Scott Brewer, Symposium on the Renaissance of Pragmatism in American Legal Thought — Afterword, 63 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1911 (1990).

Martha L. Minow & Joseph W. Singer, In Favor of Foxes: Pluralism as Fact and Aid to the Pursuit of Justice, 90 B.U. L. Rev.

Equity and Law: Fusion and Fission (John C.P. Goldberg, Henry E. Smith & Peter G. Turner eds., 2019).

John C.P. Goldberg & Henry E. Smith, Wrongful Fusion: Equity and Tort, in Equity and Law: Fusion and Fission (John C.P. Goldberg, Peter Turner &…

Gabriella Blum & John C.P. Goldberg, War for the Wrong Reasons: Lessons from Law, 11 J. Moral Phil. 454 (2014).

Sanford Levinson, Exhortation, Transformation, and Politics: Comment on M. Sandel’s The Tyranny of Merit, 1 Am. J. L. & Equal. 117 (2021).

Frank Michelman, Political Liberalism’s Constitutional Horizon: Some Further Thoughts, 4 Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia del Diritto 599 (2017).

Frank I. Michelman, Constitutional Essentials: On the Constitutional Theory of Political Liberalism (2022).

Mark Tushnet, The Dual State in the United States: The Case of Lynching and Legal Lynchings, 16 L. & Ethics Hum. Rts. 41 (2022).

Bill Watson, In Defense of the Standard Picture: What the Standard Picture Explains that the Moral Impact Theory Cannot, 28 Legal Theory 59 (2022).

Jon D. Hanson, Introduction: Ideology, Psychology, and Law, in Ideology, Psychology, and Law 1 (Jon D. Hanson, ed. 2012).

Ideology, Psychology, and Law (Jon D. Hanson ed., Oxford Univ. Press 2012).

Ronald Chen & Jon Hanson, The Illusion of Law: The Legitimating Schemas of Modern Policy and Corporate Law, 103 Mich. L. Rev. (2004).

Stephen E. Sachs, Originalism: Standard and Procedure, 135 Harv. L. Rev. 777 (2022).

William Baude & Stephen E. Sachs, Grounding Originalism, 113 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1455 (2019).

Stephen E. Sachs, Finding Law, 107 Calif. L. Rev. 527 (2019).

Christopher Lewis, Inequality, Incentives, Criminality & Blame, 22 Legal Theory 153 (2016).

Benjamin Eidelson, Respect, Individualism, and Colorblindness, 129 Yale L.J. 1600 (2020).

Benjamin Eidelson, Treating People as Individuals, in Philosophical Foundations of Discrimination Law (Deborah Hellman & Sophia Moreau eds., 2013).

Benjamin Eidelson, Discrimination and Disrespect (2015).

Benjamin Eidelson, Book Review, 128 Ethics 678 (2018)(reviewing Iyiola Solanke, Discrimination as Stigma: A Theory of Anti-discrimination Law (2017)).

Ryan D. Doerfler, A Comedy of Errors or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Sensibility-Invariantism About “Funny”, 93 Pac. Phil. Q. 493 (2012).

Tom Ginsburg & Nicholas Stephanopoulos, The Concepts of Law, 84 U. Chi. L. Rev. 147 (2017).