Supreme Court of the United States

Laurence H. Tribe, Peek-A-Boo: Justice Breyer, Dissenting, 128 Harv. L. Rev. 498 (2014).

Laurence H. Tribe, Judicial Interpretation of Statutes: Three Axioms, 11 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 51 (1988).

Laurence H. Tribe, Pursuing the Pursuit of Happiness, 45 N.Y. Rev. Books, Sept. 24, 1998, at 30 (reviewing Charles L. Black, Jr., A New Birth…

Laurence H. Tribe, Reagan’s Constitution, New Republic, Sept. 30, 1985, at 10.

Laurence H. Tribe, Contrasting Constitutional Visions: Of Real and Unreal Differences, 22 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 95 (1987).

Laurence H. Tribe, Respecting Dissent: Justice Ginsburg’s Critique of the Troubling Invocation of Appearance, 127 Harv. L. Rev. 477 (2013).

Laurence Tribe, Book Review, 73 A.B.A. J. Oct. 1987, at 142 (reviewing William Rehnquist, The Supreme Court: How It Was, How It Is (1987).

Laurence H. Tribe, Trial by Fury: Why Congress Must Curb Bush’s Military Courts, 225 New Republic, Dec. 10, 2001, at 18.

Laurence Tribe, What Difference Can a Justice or Two Make?, A.B.A. J. Sept. 1985, at 60.

Laurence Tribe, Structural Due Process, 10 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 269 (1975).

Laurence H. Tribe, eroG .v hsuB and its Disguises: Freeing Bush v. Gore from its Hall of Mirrors, 115 Harv. L. Rev. 170 (2001).

Laurence Tribe, Toward a Syntax of the Unsaid: Construing the Sounds of Congressional and Constitutional Silence, 57 Ind. L.J. 515 (1982).

Laurence Tribe, The Legislative Veto Decision: A Law by Any Other Name?, 21 Harv. J. on Legis. 1 (1984).

Laurence Tribe, Justice Stewart: A Tale of Two Portraits, 95 Yale L.J. 1328 (1986).

Laurence H. Tribe, Defining “High Crimes and Misdemeanors”: Basic Principles, 67 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 712 (1999).

Laurence H. Tribe, Seven Deadly Sins of Straining the Constitution Through a Pseudo-Scientific Sieve, 36 Hastings L.J. 155 (1984).

Laurence H. Tribe & Michael C. Dorf, Brief of Amici Curiae Professors Laurence H. Tribe and Michael C. Dorf in Support of Petitioners: Obergefell v.

Louis Kaplow, On the Design of Legal Rules: Balancing Versus Structured Decision Procedures, 132 Harv. L. Rev. 992 (2019).

Lawrence Lessig, A Response to Professor Maltz on the Slaughterhouse Case, The Originalism Blog (Nov. 7, 2022).

Lawrence Lessig, How Merrick Garland Can Put the Supreme Court’s Originalists on Notice, Slate (Oct. 13, 2022).

Lawrence Lessig, The Supreme Court Needs Its Own Filibuster, Slate, Feb. 15, 2022.