Child Categories
Judges & Jurisprudence
-
Packages of Judicial Independence: Implications for reform proposals on the selection & tenure of Article III judges
August 27, 2026
Vicki C. Jackson, Packages of Judicial Independence: implications for reform proposals on the selection & tenure of Article III judges, 137 Daedalus 48 (2008).
-
The Rationale for Motions in the Design of Adjudication
August 27, 2026
Steven Shavell, The Rationale for Motions in the Design of Adjudication 20 Am. L. & Econ. Rev. 245 (2018).
-
Legal Realism for Economists
August 27, 2026
Matthew C. Stephenson, Legal Realism for Economists, 23 J. Econ. Persp. 191 (2009).
-
The Welfare Effects of Minority-Protective Judicial Review
August 27, 2026
Justin Fox & Matthew C. Stephenson, The Welfare Effects of Minority-Protective Judicial Review, 27 J. Theoretical Pol. 499 (2015).
-
Book Review: William Davenport Mercer. Diminishing the Bill of Rights: Barron v. Baltimore and the Foundations of American Liberty.
August 27, 2026
Mark Tushnet, Book Review, 123 Am. Hist. Rev. 1671 (2018) (reviewing William Davenport Mercer, Diminishing the Bill of Rights: Barron v. Baltimore and the Foundations…
-
The Politics of Constitutional Law
August 27, 2026
Mark Tushnet, The Politics of Constitutional Law, 79 Tex. L. Rev. 163 (2000)(reviewing Lucas A. Powe, Jr., The Warren Court and American Politics (2000)).
-
Mark Tushnet, Scepticism about Judicial Review: A Perspective from the United States, in Sceptical Essays on Human Rights 359 (Tom Campbell, K.D. Ewing & Adam…
-
A Precedent-Based Critique of Legal Positivism
August 27, 2026
John C.P. Goldberg & Benjamin C. Zipursky, A Precedent-Based Critique of Legal Positivism (Harv. Pub. L. Working Paper No. 22-06, Apr. 7, 2022).
-
Experimental Investigations of Judicial Decision-Making
August 27, 2026
Lukas Holste & Holger Spamann, Experimental Investigations of Judicial Decision-Making, in The Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Jurisprudence (Kevin P. Tobia ed., 2025).
-
Holger Spamann, Comment on “Temperature and Decisions: Evidence from 207,000 Court Cases”, 14 Am. Econ. J.: Applied Econ. 519 (2022).
-
Holger Spamann & Lars Klöhn, Can Law Students Replace Judges in Experiments of Judicial Decision-Making?, 1 J.L. & Empirical Analysis 1 (2024).
-
Holger Spamann et al., Judges in the Lab: No Precedent Effects, No Common/Civil Law Differences, 13 J. Legal Analysis 110 (2021).
-
Law Matters — Less Than We Thought
August 27, 2026
Daniel M. Klerman & Holger Spamann, Law Matters — Less Than We Thought, J. L., Econ., & Org. (2022).
-
Precedents and Chinese Judges: An Experiment
August 27, 2026
John Zhuang Liu, Lars Klöhn & Holger Spamann, Precedents and Chinese Judges: An Experiment, 69 Am. J. Comp. L. 93 (2021).
-
Are Sleepy Punishers Really Harsh Punishers? Comment on Cho, Barnes, and Guanara (2017)
August 27, 2026
Holger Spamann, Are Sleepy Punishers Really Harsh Punishers? Comment on Cho, Barnes, and Guanara (2017), 29 Psychol. Sci. 1006 (2018).
-
Letter to the Editor
August 27, 2026
David Rosenberg, Letter to the Editor, 102 Am. Hist. Rev. 1307 (1997)(author’s response to John Henry Schlegel, review of The Hidden Holmes: His Theory of…
-
Judicial Politics and Sentencing Decisions
August 27, 2026
Alma Cohen & Crystal S. Yang, Judicial Politics and Sentencing Decisions, 11 Am. Econ. J.: Econ. Pol’y 160 (2019).
-
Democracy, Disagreement, and Authority: A Response to the Symposium on Common Good Constitutionalism
August 27, 2026
Adrian Vermeule, Democracy, Disagreement, and Authority: A Response to the Symposium on Common Good Constitutionalism, Am. J. Juris. (2025).
-
Martha Minow, Equality, Equity, and Algorithms: Learning from Justice Rosalie Abella, 73 U. Toronto L. J. 163 (2023).
-
Justice Scalia’s uncertain legacy
August 19, 2026
Richard Re, Justice Scalia’s uncertain legacy, SCOTUSblog (Mar. 24, 2026).
-
A Rule against Fun
August 19, 2026
Richard Re, A Rule Against Fun, JOTWELL (July 22, 2022) (reviewing Nina Varsava, Professional Irresponsibility and Judicial Opinions, 59 Houston Law Review 103 (2021)).