Media Mentions

Harvard Law School professor Mary Ann Glendon, who turned down the University of Notre Dame's Laetare Medal the year President Barack Obama gave the commencement address, will receive the 2018 Notre Dame Evangelium Vitae Medal from the university's Center's for Ethics and Culture...She had been announced as the recipient of Notre Dame's Laetare Medal in 2009, but turned down the honor and did not attend the commencement ceremony because Obama was to be the primary speaker and receive an honorary degree.

When President Trump called for owners of National Football League teams to fire players who take a knee during the national anthem to protest racism, the response by players and others was an even more widespread dissent before games that touched a deep cultural nerve and shook a seminal American institution...“As a general rule, the Constitution’s free speech protections don’t apply in private-sector workplaces — including the NFL — so the First Amendment generally isn’t much help here,” said Benjamin Sachs, Kestnbaum Professor of Labor and Industry at Harvard Law School and an authority on labor law.

...Faced with a lawsuit in Delaware, the state Medicaid program began loosening up treatment criteria this year, and in January will begin approving enrollees regardless of the severity of their disease. The state joins more than a dozen others that no longer (or never did) restrict hepatitis C treatment based on disease severity, said Kevin Costello, director of litigation at Harvard Law School’s Center for Health Law and Policy Innovation, which has been a key player in litigation in Delaware and other states.

Recently, I have worked with a number of professional services firms committed to equality, diversity and inclusion. Many offer diversity training and leadership development programs, and many support affinity groups for traditionally underrepresented groups. However, none has been able to crack what sometimes feels like a code set in stone: significantly increased diversity at the entry level, but very little change at the top...What if a de-biasing algorithm were used making sure the language in the feedback given was not inadvertently favoring one group over another? Field experiments by Paola Cecchi-Dimeglio of Harvard Law School suggest that such a process can level the playing field better than traditional, yearly performance appraisals.

...Joe Goffman, a long time air pollution attorney and a key architect of the Obama administration's Clean Power Plan, will be the next executive director of Harvard Law School's Environmental Law Program. Goffman has worked for 30 years in various government roles. He was senior counsel in the Environmental Protection Agency's air and radiation office during the Obama administration, and since President Trump's inauguration, has worked in the Democratic staff on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. "Using the vast intellectual and educational resources of the law school and the larger university, the ELP has already proven itself to be one of the country's most effective platforms to advance national environmental policy," Goffman said in a statement.

As the needs of clients become increasingly complex and professional expertise gets more specialized, collaboration within law firms will be more important than ever, according to a Monday presentation by a Harvard Law School researcher. There is a “significant correlation” between the number of internal connections a professional services provider has and its business outcomes, Heidi Gardner, a distinguished fellow at Harvard Law School, said Monday during her presentation for edTalks, a webinar series put on by Exterro and Georgetown Law Continuing Legal Education. “By collaborating, highly specialized experts can integrate their knowledge to tackle more complex, sophisticated issues than any of them could tackle alone,” Gardner said.

Russian operatives set up an array of misleading Web sites and social media pages to identify American voters susceptible to propaganda, then used a powerful Facebook tool to repeatedly send them messages designed to influence their political behavior, say people familiar with the investigation into foreign meddling in the U.S. election...The revelations come at a moment when investigators are widening their probe into how Russian operatives used Facebook, Twitter, Google and other technology platforms to widen fissures in the United States and spread disinformation during election season...“There’s been some thought that the Internet was a goose laying golden eggs, but now there’s a sense that all the eggs are not golden,” said Jonathan Zittrain, faculty director of Harvard’s Berkman Klein Center for Internet and Society.

An op-ed by Ramy Khouili and Daniel Levine-Spound `19. On 26 July 2017, the Tunisian parliament passed a law on the "Elimination of Violence Against Women," a broad piece of legislation which promises to dramatically impact the state’s handling of gender-based violence, the prosecution of abusers, and the protection of survivors. Hailed as a "landmark step" in Tunisia’s efforts to combat violence against women, the law defines new criminal offenses, significantly modifies current legislation and mandates several new government initiatives. Following the announcement of the final vote, celebratory cries and a spontaneous rendition of the Tunisian national anthem broke out in parliament. But the unanimous vote belies years of arduous effort that ultimately led to its enactment.

An op-ed by Hal Scott and John Gulliver. Is your personal information safe from the Securities and Exchange Commission? The SEC has mandated that U.S. stock exchanges and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority establish a database by November 2018 that will store the names, birth dates, Social Security numbers and brokerage accounts of tens of millions of U.S. investors as part of the Consolidated Audit Trail. Like Equifax and the SEC’s database of corporate filings, the CAT will be a prime target for cyberthieves. And a breach of the CAT could be even more consequential. Cybersecurity experts have said hackers could use the personal information it will store to make direct withdrawals from investors’ retirement accounts.

As social media becomes increasingly integral to everyday life, four Harvard professors discussed its impact on individuals’ identities and relationships at a panel event Monday. Panelists including Law School professor Yochai Benkler, Berkman Center fellow Judith S. Donath, Medical School professor Michael O. Rich, and Kennedy School professor Todd T. Rogers gave their perspectives on social media in a panel moderated by Government Department Chair Jennifer L. Hochschild and organized by Harvard’s Mind Brain Behavior initiative. Benkler discussed the phenomenon of “fake news,” delineating two contrasting psychological theories about how humans consume information.

An interview with Ari Peskoe. Thought that controversial grid resiliency report ordered by Energy Secretary Rick Perry was only an intellectual exercise? It didn't take long for the Department of Energy to put it into action -- in exactly the way that critics feared when the report was first announced. Last week, Perry asked federal energy regulators to consider new rules that would value coal and nuclear plants that are capable of keeping 90 days of fuel on hand. In other words: Find a way to help keep struggling baseload plants open by offering them a new financial incentive.

Public high schools are sending conflicting messages to their football players and cheerleaders about possible punishment for refusing to stand during the pre-game national anthem. One Louisiana school district threatened to suspend protesting players from the team, while a New Jersey high school said the students have the First Amendment right to protest. Which is correct?...A public school that punishes a student for a silent protest could face a lawsuit for violating the student’s First Amendment rights, Harvard constitutional law professor Laurence Tribe told TheWrap. “Any student punished by a public school or other governmental entity for taking a knee could challenge the punishment successfully in court, probably with the assistance, pro bono, of the local chapter of the ACLU,” Tribe said.

...On Monday, the Supreme Court opened its fall term with National Labor Relations Board v. Murphy Oil USA, and two similar cases, that will determine whether companies can force workers like Hobson to sign away their right to file collective suits. The decision in the cases, which were heard jointly, has the potential to push millions more workers into individual arbitration hearings that lack many of the protections of the US legal system...Sharon Block, the director of Harvard’s Labor and Worklife Program and a former NLRB board member, is concerned that Murphy Oil could be used to stamp out other workplace rights. Block and Benjamin Sachs, a Harvard law professor, recently highlighted how the Trump administration’s brief casts doubt on the legal protections for collective actions outside of a traditional union context. That interpretation, Block says, could prevent workers from jointly asking for wage increases or joining worker centers that advocate for higher wages. Those rights are particularly important as union membership declines.

An op-ed by Noah Feldman. President Donald Trump managed to head off the drama of a Supreme Court confrontation, for now, by issuing a new travel ban last week. But the justices begin a new term Monday with other exciting, high-profile cases planned, tackling issues such as religious liberty and equality, privacy, unions and employees’ rights, and international human rights. One of the cases, a challenge to partisan gerrymandering, could turn out to be the most game-changing decision by the court in the realm of politics since one person, one vote.

An op-ed by Noah Feldman. There’s something profoundly morbid about watching the U.S. Supreme Court and worrying about the health of your favorite aging justices. (They’re 84, 81 and 79, by the way.) A mandatory retirement age would take away the uncertainty. Such a rule was part of an elaborate court-packing plan proposed Monday by the president of Poland -- before he withdrew it under intense international pressure. In principle, age limits for life-tenured judicial appointees make a lot of sense.

An op-ed by Cass Sunstein. As Justice Neil Gorsuch starts his first full term on the Supreme Court, many people are cheering what they see as his conservatism, and many others are mourning it. But an investigation of his opinions as an appeals court judge offers a more complicated picture about his beliefs and his approach to the law. First, Gorsuch is fiercely protective of the independence of the judiciary -- and, in important respects, he is skeptical about executive power. Second, he is a bold thinker, willing to go in novel directions. Third, he is a fine writer.

Donald Trump has maintained for seven months that he cannot release his tax returns because he is being audited by the Internal Revenue Service, making him the first major-party nominee for president since Gerald Ford to withhold such records from the public...“The courts could say, if the public thinks the tax returns are so important, let it demand that the candidate authorize the IRS to release them on pain of losing votes,” said Jonathan Zittrain, a privacy expert and professor at Harvard Law School.

An interview with fellow Thomas Abt. This week, the FBI released new crime statistics showing 17,250 homicides in the US last year, an increase of over 8.5% from the year prior. The right-wing media quickly sprang into action: Breitbart’s headline read: “FBI Data: Post-Ferguson Murder Spike Reaches 3761 Dead,” while the Daily Caller declared, “The FBI Just Confirmed What Sessions Has Been Saying About Violent Crime.” (For his part, Jeff Sessions responded with a predictable message of doom about "surrender[ing] our communities to lawlessness and violence.”) The left-wing response, meanwhile, came with its own politicized interpretation, downplaying the spike and shifting the focus to the apparent root causes of crime.

Harvard Law School constitutional law professor Laurence Tribe joins Joy Reid to explain why in his view Donald Trump may be unconstitutionally using the power of the government to pressure NFL players through the NFL.

Thurgood Marshall is revered as a titan of the U.S. Civil Rights Movement, the architect of the landmark court case that ended legal segregation in America’s public schools, and the first African-American Supreme Court justice. Yet for five of his former law clerks gathered Wednesday at Harvard Law School (HLS), he was more than that. For Mark Tushnet, William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Law, Marshall was a messenger of hope and courage to African-Americans who endured the injustices of the Jim Crow South...For Randall Kennedy, Michael R. Klein Professor of Law, who clerked for Marshall in the ’80s, the associate justice was a source of pride, lifting the spirits and the consciousness of black Americans who were treated as second-class citizens...For Martha Minow, former dean of Harvard Law School, Carter Professor of General Jurisprudence, and University Distinguished Service Professor, who also clerked for Marshall, he was the embodiment of a deep commitment to social justice and faith in the power of the rule of law to bring equal rights to all eventually...The panel was moderated by Tomiko Brown-Nagin, Daniel P.S. Paul Professor of Constitutional Law, director of the Charles Hamilton Houston Institute for Race & Justice, and professor of history in the Faculty of Arts and Sciences, and Kenneth Mack, the Lawrence D. Biele Professor of Law...“He was a formidable person in all respects,” recalled another former clerk, William Fisher, WilmerHale Professor of Intellectual Property Law and faculty director of the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society...Carol Steiker, Henry J. Friendly Professor of Law and Special Adviser for Public Service, said she developed a lifelong interest in death penalty law during her clerkship with Marshall.

Today is the opening day of the Supreme Court's fall term. Harvard law and history professor Annette Gordon-Reed is a Pulitzer Prize-winning author and this hour in a Chautauqua Lecture she explores the origins, and the evolution, of the nation's highest court. Alexander Hamilton called it "the least dangerous" branch of government. She titled her lecture, "The Supreme Court: Hamilton's vision vs. reality."