Skip to content

Archive

Media Mentions

  • ‘We obviously are suspicious’ — Dems prep for 2019

    November 1, 2018

    House Democrats can't wait to call President Trump's EPA chief to the witness stand. The agency — long a source of controversy no matter which administration runs it — could soon be up against Democratic committee heads eager to hold hearings and subpoena documents. Trump's plans for EPA, including reshaping the workforce, overhauling the use of science and rolling back Obama-era regulations, will all get heavy scrutiny if the House flips to Democratic control next year...Joe Goffman, then a top air adviser at EPA when Republicans gained power after the 2010 elections, remembered the scrutiny from the Oversight panel under then-Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.). "You had a committee using its investigatory powers to interject itself in a rulemaking. They were not looking at management or practices. They were treating a rulemaking as a form of malfeasance or misfeasance," said Goffman, now executive director of the Harvard Law School's Environmental & Energy Law Program. "They were treating the rulemaking process as if the agency was engaging in some sort of misconduct."

  • A 14th Amendment primer

    November 1, 2018

    President Trump’s pledge to sign an executive order in an effort to abolish the constitutional guarantee of birthright citizenship has focused attention on the 14th Amendment, which states that anyone born in the country is an American citizen....“The idea that the president has the power to end birthright citizenship, plainly protected by Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment, by executive order is preposterous,” said Michael Klarman, a professor at Harvard Law School. “Constitutional scholars who agree about little else have agreed about this for over a century.”

  • U.S. archivists release Watergate report that could be possible ‘road map’ for Mueller

    November 1, 2018

    U.S. archivists on Wednesday revealed one of the last great secrets of the Watergate investigation — the backbone of a long-sealed report used by special prosecutor Leon Jaworski to send Congress evidence in the legal case against President Richard M. Nixon...Sirica’s modern-day successor, Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell, of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, on Oct. 11 ordered the disclosure of Jaworski’s report by the National Archives and Records Administration — with limited redactions — in response to petitions by California author and former Nixon deputy Watergate defense counsel Geoffrey Shepard and by Brookings Institution senior fellow Benjamin Wittes; Jack Goldsmith, a Harvard University law professor who led the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel under President George W. Bush; and Stephen Bates, a professor at the University of Nevada at Las Vegas, who co-wrote the Starr report with Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh years before his rise to the Supreme Court, as well as other members of Starr’s team.

  • Supreme Court Justices Weigh Limits on Settlements in Google Case

    November 1, 2018

    U.S. Supreme Court justices questioned an $8.5 million Google settlement in a case that could make it harder for companies to resolve class-action lawsuits without providing direct compensation to those affected...Critics say such settlements are an increasingly common litigation tactic, used by Facebook Inc. as well as Google. But a brief filed by Harvard law professor William Rubenstein said that in the past two decades federal judges have approved only 18 cy pres settlements in which all the money went to lawyers and outside groups.

  • The Watergate Road Map: What It Says and What It Suggests for Mueller

    November 1, 2018

    An article by Jack Goldsmith and Benjamin Wittes. In neat script near the top of the document, someone has written, “Filed under seal, March 1, 1974.” Above that, red typed letters read, “Unsealed October 11, 2018 by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell, United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Order No. 11-mc-44 (BAH). The Jaworski “Road Map,” the last great still-secret Watergate document, became public Wednesday when the National Archives released it under Judge Howell’s ruling from earlier this month. It sees the light of day for the first time in four and a half decades at a remarkable moment, one in which a different special prosecutor is considering the conduct of a different president and reportedly contemplating—as Watergate Special Prosecutor Leon Jaworski once did—writing a report on the subject. The document’s release owes a great deal to the legal team at Protect Democracy, which represented Stephen Bates and the two of us in seeking its unsealing.

  • Experts Explore the Consequences of Bad Science on the Justice System

    November 1, 2018

    A panel co-hosted by ProPublica, The New York Times Magazine, Harvard Law School’s Charles Hamilton Houston Institute for Race and Justice, and Harvard Law’s Criminal Justice Policy Program looked at the use of unreliable forensic science practices and models for reform...Held on Oct. 25 at Harvard Law School, the discussion convened prominent leaders from across the judicial system — including Nancy Gertner, a retired federal district judge and Harvard Law School senior lecturer

  • Harvard Law Gives Public Free Access to Four Centuries of U.S. Court Cases

    November 1, 2018

    The Library Innovation Lab at Harvard Law School published a full collection of United States court cases dating from 1658 to 2018 on Monday as part of a years-long project to make case law more accessible. The initiative, dubbed the Caselaw Access Project, digitized more than 40 million pages of U.S. state, federal, and territorial case law documents from the Law School library. Though basic information for all cases in the database is now publicly accessible, users are limited to five hundred full case texts per day. Harvard affiliates currently have unlimited access to all case texts. Adam Ziegler, who directed the project, said his team worked on the Caselaw Access Project for more than six years. “It started with the simple observation that there was a real need for ready access to court opinions,” Ziegler said...Several Law School faculty members expressed their optimism about the project and its potential. Law School Professor I. Glenn Cohen called the project “a game changer,” and Law School Professor Christopher T. Bavitz said the initiative will bring about “enormous benefits” for teaching, research, and legal analysis.

  • Recognize, Define, and Condemn Anti-Semitism

    October 31, 2018

    An op-ed by David J. Benger `20. On Sep. 6, 1972, Munich Olympic Games correspondent James K. “Jim” McKay looked at the television camera and solemnly pronounced, “Our greatest hopes and our worst fears are seldom realized. Our worst fears have been realized tonight.” All 11 Israeli Olympic athletes who were kidnapped by Black September, a Palestinian terrorist organization, had been confirmed killed. I have thought of that moment frequently during the last few days. The parallels to the attack on the Tree of Life synagogue in Pittsburgh are striking. Eleven people died in both attacks. Equally poignantly, both attacks yielded victims who had themselves lived through the era of the Holocaust. Perhaps most importantly, both were culminations of hateful rhetoric gone unchecked.

  • Trump’s birthright citizenship plan hit by local legal scholars

    October 31, 2018

    ...“Even Trump and his lawyers surely realize that this off-the-wall threat has no legal legs to stand on and wouldn’t get the votes even of the most stalwart judicial conservatives,” said Laurence H. Tribe, a constitutional law professor at Harvard.

  • Birthright Citizenship Puts Trump Judges in a Bind

    October 31, 2018

    An op-ed by Noah Feldman. Whatever he’s being told by his lawyers, President Donald Trump can’t use an executive order to deny birthright citizenship to U.S.-born children of undocumented parents. The Constitution puts Congress, not the president, in charge of citizenship.

  • Legal experts: President Donald Trump can’t eliminate birthright citizenship by executive order

    October 31, 2018

    President Donald Trump's proposal to eliminate birthright citizenship was met with skepticism in Massachusetts Tuesday by legal experts who say it will not pass constitutional muster. ..."The president is coming out of outer space to think that the president has the authority to change the rules on who is a citizen," said Harvard Law Professor Gerald Neuman, an expert on human rights and immigration law. Neuman said there have been occasional movements over the years to change the definition of citizenship, but there "is no credible argument" that it is permissible under the U.S. Constitution. "Tampering with the guarantee of citizenship under the Constitution is an extremely dangerous and serious business," Neuman said.

  • Vincentian law student wants climate change addressed

    October 31, 2018

    The Vincentian-born president of the Harvard Law Review, Michael Thomas, Jr., wants climate change to be seriously addressed. In delivering the keynote address Sunday at the gala Independence Anniversary Luncheon, marking St. Vincent and the Grenadines’ 39th Anniversary of Independence, at Grand Prospect Hall in Brooklyn, Thomas said now that he’s on the verge of leaving law school, he’s been spending a lot of time thinking about what comes next...Thomas said, as the international community learns more about climate change, “we must come together to face this problem globally. “This is the greatest challenge my generation faces,” he said. “A massive hurricane, the likes of which we see with increasing frequency, will someday affect St. Vincent and the Grenadines. It is not a question of ‘if,’ but rather ‘when.’

  • Trump plans executive order to end birthright citizenship

    October 31, 2018

    President Trump’s stunning new promise to end birthright citizenship by executive order is roiling the midterm debate at the eleventh hour, fanning the flames of an already explosive immigration fight — and dividing Republican message-makers — just days before voters head to the polls...Laurence Tribe, professor of constitutional law at Harvard University, said in an email that the president can no more eliminate birthright citizenship “than he could wipe out the First Amendment (or the Second, for that matter).” “Even Trump and his lawyers surely realize that this off-the-wall threat has the weakest possible legal legs to stand on and wouldn’t be likely to get the votes even of the most stalwart judicial conservatives,” Tribe said. “And they must realize as well that this threat, while legally all but empty, nonetheless strikes fear in the hearts of a vast number of legal immigrants and current citizens — both naturalized and by birth.”

  • Restaurants have strict standards to protect customers. Tech platforms don’t

    October 31, 2018

    One of the reasons you're able to enjoy a meal in a restaurant is because you're not too worried that it's clean in the kitchen. That's because you know that restaurants have to meet a minimum standard of cleanliness, or risk being shut down. The restaurant is obligated to act in the best interests of its diners. This is one example used by Jonathan Zittrain to argue that it may be time to create a similar kind of obligation for social media platforms and other tech giants who hold our personal data. Along with Yale constitutional law professor Jack Balkin, Zittrain has long floated the idea that today's online tech platforms become 'information fiduciaries'.

  • Corruption-fighting AG? Easy to say, harder to do

    October 30, 2018

    Come election time, it's popular for Illinois Republicans and Democrats, when political circumstances suit them, to clamor for the state's top lawyer to investigate corruption—almost always, to no avail...Yet candidates often cannot resist taking up the cudgel of anti-corruption, sometimes identifying their targets by name. "If I say, 'Elect me and I'll go after Donald Trump or Speaker (Mike) Madigan or Jared Kushner,' anyone who says that is absolutely wrong," said James Tierney, former attorney general of Maine and now a lecturer at Harvard Law School. "That is the opposite of what our criminal justice system is supposed to be about."

  • Project Provides Access to All U.S. Case Law, Covering 360 Years

    October 30, 2018

    Launching today is the capstone to a massive project executed over the last three years to digitize all U.S. case law, some 6.4 million cases dating all the way back to 1658, a span of 360 years. The Caselaw Access Project site launching today makes all published U.S. court decisions freely available to the public in a consistent digitized format. The site is the product of a partnership started in 2015 between Harvard Law School’s Library Innovation Lab and legal research service Ravel Law to digitize Harvard’s entire collection of U.S. case law, which Harvard says it the most comprehensive and authoritative database of American law and cases available anywhere outside the Library of Congress...On Friday, I visited the Library Innovation Lab at Harvard Law School and met with Adam Ziegler, director, and Jack Cushman, senior developer, who have me a preview of the site.

  • Harvard Law Just Released 6.5 Million Court Decisions Online

    October 30, 2018

    In a significant milestone for public access to the law, the Library Innovation Lab at Harvard Law School on Monday published more than 40 million pages of U.S. court decisions online. The publication, which represents nearly 6.5 million state and federal court cases, is the culmination of a five-year project that saw Harvard slice the spines off a vast collection of legal reporter books in order to digitize them...According to Adam Ziegler, Director of the Library Innovation Lab, the library is also working with state governments to help them ensure all future decisions are published online in a machine-readable fashion with a neutral citation system. Ziegler also noted the Caselaw Access Project will be a treasure trove for legal scholars, especially those who employ big data techniques to parse the corpus. “It’s an opportunity to reconstruct the law as a data source, and write computer programs to peruse millions of cases,” he said.

  • Affirmative Action: Curse or Cure?

    October 29, 2018

    A letter by Joseph Gallardo `19. Bret, sorry to hear about how much you let people’s opinion of you affect you — especially because, well, your name is Bret Stephens, and I doubt your appearance sets off many affirmative action flags. I can’t imagine how you’d deal if you were, say, black or Latino. I’m a student at Harvard Law School. Before this, I was a homeless high school dropout who took six years to graduate — ranked second to last in my graduating class. The road traveled to Harvard was paved with hard work, sacrifice and, yes, presumably the help of affirmative action. Contrary to your suggestion that I may never know my own worth, I know I deserve to be a soon-to-be alumnus of this school.

  • Did the FBI cover up the bomb suspect’s van to hide conservative stickers?

    October 29, 2018

    Did the FBI cover up the bomb suspect's van to hide conservative stickers?..."That strikes me as completely standard to protect the integrity of the evidence," Alex Whiting, professor of criminal law at Harvard said. "They will likely examine the van for fingerprints, hair and fiber, and bomb residue."

  • NH residents react to NH Supreme Court’s move on SB3

    October 29, 2018

    With nine days before the election, the New Hampshire Supreme Court's move to permit voter registration requirements to go forward unleashed a torrent of reactions from supporters and opponents of the controversial 2017 law....Lawrence Lessig is a Harvard Law School professor who founded Equal Citizens and led statewide marches through New Hampshire for campaign finance reform. "Instead of moving towards a 21st century democracy that promotes an equal freedom to vote, the New Hampshire Legislature and courts have chosen to make casting a ballot even harder," Lessig said. "We should be engaging voters, especially young voters, in the political process, not, as today's decision has done, stifle it."

  • Papadopoulos considers withdrawing guilty plea to Mueller charges

    October 29, 2018

    Former Trump campaign aide George Papadopoulos said Friday he’s considering withdrawing his plea deal with special counsel Robert Mueller after learning “certain information” during an interview with House Republicans on Thursday...Professor Alex Whiting, a Harvard Law School expert on criminal law, called it “virtually impossible.” “When he pled guilty he would have been required to answer questions that would now make it almost impossible for him to succeed,” Whiting said. Whiting said Papadopoulos would have to show that his plea was not voluntary, but was coerced, or that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. “The grounds are narrow and the guilty plea process is designed to ensure that all of the potential grounds are addressed and therefore it is extremely difficult for a defendant to undo a guilty plea,” he said.