Child Categories
Judges & Jurisprudence
-
McClesky v. Kemp: Race, Capital Punishment, and the Supreme Court
December 4, 2024
Randall L. Kennedy, McClesky v. Kemp: Race, Capital Punishment, and the Supreme Court, 101 Harv. L. Rev. 1388 (1988).
-
Book review: Legal Realism at Yale, 1927–1960
December 4, 2024
Morton J. Horwitz, Book Review, 75 J. Am. Hist. 299 (1988) (reviewing Laura Kalman, Legal Realism at Yale, 1927–1960 (1986)).
-
The Legacy of 1776 in Legal and Economic Thought
December 4, 2024
Morton J. Horwitz, The Legacy of 1776 in Legal and Economic Thought, 19 J.L. & Econ. 621 (1976).
-
Foreword: The Degradation of American Democracy—and the Court
December 4, 2024
Michael J. Klarman, Foreword: The Degradation of American Democracy—and the Court, 134 Harv. L. Rev. 1 (2020).
-
Rethinking the Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Revolutions
December 4, 2024
Michael J. Klarman, Rethinking the Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Revolutions, 82 Va. L. Rev. 1 (1996).
-
The Puzzling Resistance to Political Process Theory
December 4, 2024
Michael J. Klarman, The Puzzling Resistance to Political Process Theory, 77 Va. L. Rev. 747 (1991).
-
Constitutional Fact/Constitutional Fiction: A Critique of Bruce Ackerman’s Theory of Constitutional Moments
December 4, 2024
Michael J. Klarman, Constitutional Fact/Constitutional Fiction: A Critique of Bruce Ackerman’s Theory of Constitutional Moments, 44 Stan. L. Rev. 759 (1992)(reviewing Bruce Ackerman, We the…
-
Michael J. Klarman, The Judges versus the Unions: The Development of British Labor Law, 1867-1913, 75 Va. L. Rev. 1487 (1989).
-
The Racial Origins of Modern Criminal Procedure
December 4, 2024
Michael J. Klarman, The Racial Origins of Modern Criminal Procedure, 99 Mich. L. Rev. 48 (2000).
-
How Great Were the “Great” Marshall Court Decisions?
December 4, 2024
Michael J. Klarman, How Great Were the “Great” Marshall Court Decisions?, 87 Va. L. Rev. 1111 (2001).
-
Bush v. Gore Through the Lens of Constitutional History
December 4, 2024
Michael J. Klarman, Bush v. Gore Through the Lens of Constitutional History, 89 Calif. L. Rev. 1721 (2001).
-
“When the Devil Turns … ”: The Political Foundations of Independent Judicial Review
December 4, 2024
Matthew C. Stephenson, “When the Devil Turns … ”: The Political Foundations of Independent Judicial Review, 32 J. Legal Stud. 59 (2003).
-
Legal Realism for Economists
December 4, 2024
Matthew C. Stephenson, Legal Realism for Economists, 23 J. Econ. Persp. 191 (2009).
-
Judicial Deference to Inconsistent Agency Statutory Interpretations
December 4, 2024
Yehonatan Givati & Matthew C. Stephenson, Judicial Deference to Inconsistent Agency Statutory Interpretations, 40 J. Legal Stud. 85 (2011).
-
Judicial Review and Democratic Failure
December 4, 2024
Justin Fox & Matthew Stephenson, Judicial Review and Democratic Failure (Harv. Pub. L. Working Paper No. 09-47, Aug. 20, 2009).
-
Justin Fox & Matthew C. Stephenson, The Constraining, Liberating, and Informational Effects of Nonbinding Law, 31 J.L. Econ. & Org. 320 (2015).
-
Matthew C. Stephenson, Court of Public Opinion: Government Accountability and Judicial Independence, 20 J.L. Econ. & Org. 379 (2004).
-
Judicial Review as a Response to Political Posturing
December 4, 2024
Justin Fox & Matthew C. Stephenson, Judicial Review as a Response to Political Posturing, 105 Am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 397 (2011).
-
Informative Precedent and Intrajudicial Communication
December 4, 2024
Ethan Bueno de Mesquita & Matthew Stephenson, Informative Precedent and Intrajudicial Communication, 96 Am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 755 (2002).
-
Structural Free Exercise
December 4, 2024
Mary Ann Glendon & Raul F. Yanes, Structural Free Exercise, 90 Mich. L. Rev. 477 (1991).
-
American Legal Realism Today: An Idiosyncratic Restatement
December 4, 2024
Mark V. Tushnet, American Legal Realism Today: An Idiosyncratic Restatement (Jan. 5, 2022).