Eminent Domain

Mark Tushnet, Book Review, 124 Pol. Sci. Q. 559 (2009)(reviewing Patrick M. Garry, An Entrenched Legacy: How the New Deal Constitutional Revolution Continues to Shape…

Louis Kaplow, An Economic Analysis of Legal Transitions, 99 Harv. L. Rev. 509 (1986).

Louis Kaplow, Government Relief for Risk Associated with Government Action, 94 Scandinavian J. Econ. 525 (1992).

Joseph W. Singer & Jack M. Beermann, The Social Origins of Property, 6 Can. J.L. & Jurisdiction 217 (1993).

Jeannie Suk, Taking the Home, 20 Law & Literature 291 (2008).

Maureen E. Brady, The Failure of America’s First City Plan, 46 Urb. Law. 507 (2014).

Gerald E. Frug & David J. Barron, Make Eminent Domain Fair for All, Bos. Globe, Aug. 12, 2005, Op-Ed.

Gerald E. Frug & David J. Barron, Making Planning Matter: A New Approach to Eminent Domain, Harv. Design Mag., Spring/Summer 2005, at 71.

Maureen E. Brady, The Domino Effect in State Takings Law: A Response to 51 Imperfect Solutions, 2020 U. Ill. L. Rev. 1455 (2020).

Maureen E. Brady, The Damagings Clauses, 104 Va. L. Rev. 341 (2018).

Maureen E. Brady, Property Convergence in Takings Law, 46 Pepp. L. Rev. 695 (2019).

Maureen E. Brady, Property’s Ceiling: State Courts and the Expansion of Takings Clause Property, 102 Va. L. Rev. 1167 (2016).

Maureen E. Brady, Penn Central Squared: What the Many Factors of Murr v. Wisconsin Mean for Property Federalism, 166 U. Pa. L. Rev. Online 53…

Cass R. Sunstein, On Property and Constitutionalism, 14 Cardozo L. Rev. 907 (1993).

Cass R. Sunstein, Lochner’s Misunderstood Legacy, 87 Colum. L. Rev. 873 (1987).

Cass R. Sunstein, Two Faces of Liberalism, 41 U. Miami L. Rev. 245 (1986).

Cass R. Sunstein, The Beard Thesis and Franklin Roosevelt, 56 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 114 (1987).

William W. Fisher, The Significance of Public Perceptions of the Takings Doctrine, 88 Colum. L. Rev. 1774 (1988).