Parent Categories
Government & Politics
-
Vicki C. Jackson, The Supreme Court, the Eleventh Amendment, and State Sovereign Immunity, 98 Yale L.J. 1 (1988).
-
Todd D. Rakoff, Brock v. Roadway Express, Inc., and the New Law of Regulatory Due Process, 1987 Sup. Ct. Rev. 157 (1988).
-
The Long Resistance
December 4, 2024
Tomiko Brown-Nagin, The Long Resistance, 36 Law & Hist. Rev. 441 (2018).
-
Law: Economics of its Public Enforcement
December 4, 2024
A. Mitchell Polinsky & Steven Shavell, Law: Economics of its Public Enforcement, in 12 International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences 8510 (Neil J.
-
Steven Shavell, Reply to a Comment on The Appeals Process as a Means of Error Correction, 2 Legal Theory 83 (1996).
-
The Rationale for Motions in the Design of Adjudication
December 4, 2024
Steven Shavell, The Rationale for Motions in the Design of Adjudication 20 Am. L. & Econ. Rev. 245 (2018).
-
Economic Analysis of the General Structure of the Law
December 4, 2024
Steven Shavell, Economic Analysis of the General Structure of the Law (Nat’l Bureau Econ. Res. Working Paper No. w9699, Harv. L. & Econ. Discussion Paper…
-
Deterrence and the Punishment of Attempts
December 4, 2024
Steven Shavell, Deterrence and the Punishment of Attempts, 19 J. Legal Stud. 435 (1990).
-
Legal Error, Litigation, and the Incentive to Obey the Law
December 4, 2024
A. Mitchell Polinsky & Steven Shavell, Legal Error, Litigation, and the Incentive to Obey the Law, 5 J.L. Econ. & Org. 99 (1989).
-
Mandatory Versus Voluntary Disclosure of Product Risks
December 4, 2024
A. Mitchell Polinsky & Steven Shavell, Mandatory Versus Voluntary Disclosure of Product Risks, 28 J.L. Econ. & Org. 360 (2012).
-
Corruption and Optimal Law Enforcement
December 4, 2024
A. Mitchell Polinsky & Steven Shavell, Corruption and Optimal Law Enforcement, 81 J. Pub. Econ. 1 (2001).
-
When Is Compliance with the Law Socially Desirable?
December 4, 2024
Steven Shavell, When Is Compliance with the Law Socially Desirable?, 41 J. Legal Stud. 1 (2012).
-
The Appeals Process as a Means of Error Correction
December 4, 2024
Steven Shavell, The Appeals Process as a Means of Error Correction, 24 J. Legal Stud. 379 (1995).
-
A Model of the Optimal Use of Liability and Safety Regulation
December 4, 2024
Steven Shavell, A Model of the Optimal Use of Liability and Safety Regulation, 15 Rand J. Econ. 271 (1984).
-
Suit, Settlement, and Trial: A Theoretical Analysis under Alternative Methods for the Allocation of Legal Costs
December 4, 2024
Steven Shavell, Suit, Settlement, and Trial: A Theoretical Analysis under Alternative Methods for the Allocation of Legal Costs, 11 J. Legal Stud. 55 (1982).
-
The Appeals Process and Adjudicator Incentives
December 4, 2024
Steven M. Shavell, The Appeals Process and Adjudicator Incentives, 35 J. Legal Stud. 1 (2006).
-
Steven Shavell, A General Rationale for a Governmental Role in the Relief of Large Risks, 49 J. Risk & Uncertainty 213 (2014).
-
Optimal Discretion in the Application of Rules
December 4, 2024
Steven M. Shavell, Optimal Discretion in the Application of Rules, 9 Am. L. & Econ. Rev. 175 (2007).
-
Liability for Harm Versus Regulation of Safety
December 4, 2024
Steven Shavell, Liability for Harm versus Regulation of Safety, 13 J. Legal Stud. 357 (1984).
-
Steven Shavell, A Fundamental Enforcement Cost Advantage of the Negligence Rule over Regulation, 42 J. Legal Stud. 275 (2013).
-
On the Design of the Appeals Process: The Optimal Use of Discretionary Review versus Direct Appeal
December 4, 2024
Steven M. Shavell, On the Design of the Appeals Process: The Optimal Use of Discretionary Review versus Direct Appeal, 39 J. Legal Stud. 63 (2010).