Judges & Jurisprudence

Vicki C. Jackson, Cook v. Gralike: Easy Cases and Structural Reasoning, 2001 Sup. Ct. Rev. 299.

Vicki C. Jackson, Packages of Judicial Independence: implications for reform proposals on the selection & tenure of Article III judges, 95 Geo. L.J. 965 (2007).

Vicki C. Jackson, What Judges Can Learn From Gender Bias Task Force Studies, 81 Judicature 15 (1997).

Vicki C. Jackson, Introduction: Congressional Control of Jurisdiction and the Future of the Federal Courts — Opposition, Agreement, and Hierarchy, 86 Geo. L.J. 2445 (1998).

Vicki C. Jackson, One Hundred Years of Folly: The Eleventh Amendment and the 1988 Term, 64 S. Cal. L. Rev. 51 (1990).

Vicki C. Jackson, Comparative Constitutional Federalism and Transnational Judicial Discourse, 2 Int’l J. Const. L. 91 (2004).

Vicki C. Jackson, Susan Deller Ross, et al., Report of the Special Committee on Gender to the D.C. Circuit Task Force on Gender, Race, and…

Thomas J. Brennan, Lee Epstein & Nancy Staudt, Economic Trends and Judicial Outcomes: A Macrotheory of the Court, 58 Duke L.J. 1191 (2009).

Thomas J. Brennan, Lee Epstein & Nancy Staudt, The Political Economy of Judging, 93 Minn. L. Rev. 1503 (2009).

Todd D. Rakoff, In Memoriam, Henry J. Friendly, 99 Harv. L. Rev. 1725 (1986).

Todd D. Rakoff, Implied Terms: Of ‘Default Rules’ and ‘Situation-Sense’, in Good Faith and Fault in Contract Law 191 (Jack Beatson & Daniel Friedmann eds.,…

Todd D. Rakoff, Judicial Review and Administrative Action, in Common Law, Common Values, Common Rights: Essays on Our Common Heritage by Distinguished British and American…

Tomiko Brown-Nagin, Identity Matters: The Case of Judge Constance Baker Motley, 117 Colum. L. Rev. 1691 (2017).

Tomiko Brown-Nagin, The Diversity Paradox: Judicial Review in an Age of Demographic and Educational Change (Supreme Court Roundup on Fisher v. Texas), 65 Vand. L.

Steven Shavell, Reply to a Comment on The Appeals Process as a Means of Error Correction, 2 Legal Theory 83 (1996).

Steven Shavell, The Rationale for Motions in the Design of Adjudication 20 Am. L. & Econ. Rev. 245 (2018).

Steven M. Shavell, The Appeals Process and Adjudicator Incentives, 35 J. Legal Stud. 1 (2006).

Steven M. Shavell, Optimal Discretion in the Application of Rules, 9 Am. L. & Econ. Rev. 175 (2007).

Steven M. Shavell, On the Design of the Appeals Process: The Optimal Use of Discretionary Review versus Direct Appeal, 39 J. Legal Stud. 63 (2010).

Susan H. Farbstein, Justice Ginsburg’s International Perspective, 127 Harv. L. Rev. 429 (2013).

Scott Brewer, Traversing Holmes’ Path Toward a Jurisprudence of Logical Form, in “The Path of the Law” and Its Influence: The Legacy of Oliver Wendell…