Child Categories
Judges & Jurisprudence
-
Equity as Second-Order Law: The Problem of Opportunism
December 4, 2024
Henry E. Smith, Equity as Second-Order Law: The Problem of Opportunism (Jan. 15, 2015).
-
Experimental Investigations of Judicial Decision-Making
December 4, 2024
Lukas Holste & Holger Spamann, Experimental Investigations of Judicial Decision-Making, in The Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Jurisprudence (Kevin P. Tobia ed., forthcoming).
-
Holger Spamann, Comment on “Temperature and Decisions: Evidence from 207,000 Court Cases”, 14 Am. Econ. J.: Applied Econ. 519 (2022).
-
Holger Spamann et al., Judges in the Lab: No Precedent Effects, No Common/Civil Law Differences, 13 J. Legal Analysis 110 (2021).
-
Does the Supreme Court Really Not Apply Chevron When It Should?
December 4, 2024
Natalie Salmanowitz & Holger Spamann, Does the Supreme Court Really Not Apply Chevron When It Should?, 57 Int’l Rev. L. & Econ. 81 (2019).
-
Precedents and Chinese Judges: An Experiment
December 4, 2024
John Zhuang Liu, Lars Klöhn & Holger Spamann, Precedents and Chinese Judges: An Experiment, 69 Am. J. Comp. L. 93 (2021).
-
Justice Is Less Blind, and Less Legalistic, than We Thought: Evidence from an Experiment with Real Judges
December 4, 2024
Spamann, Holger & Lars Kloehn, Justice is Less Blind, and Less Legalistic, Than We Thought: Evidence from an Experiment with Real Judges, J. Legal Stud.
-
The Abiding Significance of Law in Foreign Relations
December 4, 2024
Gerald L. Neuman, The Abiding Significance of Law in Foreign Relations, 2004 Sup. Ct. Rev. 111.
-
MACHIAVELLI IN ROBES? THE COURT IN THE ELECTION
December 4, 2024
Frank Michelman, Machiavelli in Robes? The Court in the Election, in The Longest Night (Michel Rosenfeld & Arthur Jacobson eds., 2002).
-
Integrity-Anxiety?
December 4, 2024
Frank Michelman, Integrity-Anxiety?, in American Exceptionalism and Human Rights (Michael Ignatieff ed., 2009).
-
Constitutions and the Public/Private Divide
December 4, 2024
Frank Michelman, Constitutions and the Public/Private Divide, in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (András Sajó & Michel Rosenfeld eds., 2012).
-
Political-Liberal Legitimacy and the Question of Judicial Restraint
December 4, 2024
Frank I. Michelman, Political-Liberal Legitimacy and the Question of Judicial Restraint (Jan. 1, 2019).
-
Expropriation, Eviction, and the Dignity of the Common Law
December 4, 2024
Frank I. Michelman, Expropriation, Eviction, and the Dignity of the Common Law (Harv. Pub. L. Working Paper No. 12-37, 2012).
-
Foreword: Traces of Self-Government
December 4, 2024
Frank I. Michelman, Foreword: Traces of Self-Government, 100 Harv. L. Rev. 4 (1986).
-
Brennan and Democracy: The 1996-97 Brennan Center Symposium Lecture
December 4, 2024
Frank I. Michelman, Brennan and Democracy: The 1996-97 Brennan Center Symposium Lecture, 86 Calif. L. Rev. 399 (1998).
-
The 1990 McCorkle Lecture, Super Liberal: Romance, Community, and Tradition in William J. Brennan, Jr.’s Constitutional Thought
December 4, 2024
Frank I. Michelman, Super Liberal: Romance, Community, and Tradition in William J. Brennan, Jr.’s Constitutional Thought, 77 Va. L. Rev. 1261 (1991).
-
Rejoinders
December 4, 2024
Frank I. Michelman, Rejoinders, 86 Calif. L. Rev. 469 (1998).
-
Reasonable Umbrage: Race and Constitutional Antidiscrimination Law in the United States and South Africa
December 4, 2024
Frank I. Michelman, Reasonable Umbrage: Race and Constitutional Antidiscrimination Law in the United States and South Africa, 117 Harv. L. Rev. 1378 (2004).
-
“Terry Firma”: Background Democracy and Constitutional Foundations
December 4, 2024
Frank I. Michelman, “Terry Firma”: Background Democracy and Constitutional Foundations, 99 Mich. L. Rev. 1827 (2001).
-
Socioeconomic Rights in Constitutional Law: Explaining America Away
December 4, 2024
Frank I. Michelman, Socioeconomic Rights in Constitutional Law: Explaining America Away, 6 Int’l J. Const. L. 663 (2008).
-
Does Interest Group Theory Justify More Intrusive Judicial Review?
December 4, 2024
Einer R. Elhauge, Does Interest Group Theory Justify More Intrusive Judicial Review?, 101 Yale L.J. 31 (1991).