Parent Categories
Constitutional Law
-
Revised Opinions in Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton (concurring)
August 19, 2026
Mark Tushnet, Revised Opinions in Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton (concurring), in What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said: The Nation’s Top Legal…
-
Mark Tushnet, The Evolution of Federalism in the United States: A Continuing Convention?, in Towards a European Constitution A Historical and Political Comparison with the…
-
Judicial Review
August 19, 2026
Mark Tushnet, Judicial Review, in Encyclopedia of the Supreme Court of the United States v. 2, at 60 (David S. Tanenhaus ed., 2008).
-
Constitutionalism
August 19, 2026
Mark Tushnet, Constitutionalism, in Encyclopedia of the Supreme Court of the United States v. 1, at 412 (David S. Tanenhaus ed., 2008).
-
Citizen as Lawyer, Lawyer as Citizen
August 19, 2026
Mark Tushnet, Citizen as Lawyer, Lawyer as Citizen, 50 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1379 (2009).
-
Legal Reasoning in Congress
August 19, 2026
Mark Tushnet, Legal Reasoning in Congress, 95 Iowa L. Rev. Bull.. 81 (2010).
-
Progressive Constitutionalism: What is “It”?
August 19, 2026
Mark Tushnet, Progressive Constitutionalism: What Is “It”?, 72 Ohio St. L.J. 1073 (2011).
-
Abolishing Judicial Review
August 19, 2026
Mark Tushnet, Abolishing Judicial Review, 27 Const. Comment. 581 (2011).
-
“I Couldn’t See It Until I Believed It”: Some Notes on Motivated Reasoning in Constitutional Adjudication
August 19, 2026
Mark Tushnet, “I Couldn’t See It Until I Believed It”: Some Notes on Motivated Reasoning in Constitutional Adjudication, 125 Harv. L. Rev. F. 1 (2011).
-
Response: “Two Paths, One Result”: A (Heavily Qualified) Defense of Consensus Constitutionalism
August 19, 2026
Mark Tushnet, Response: “Two Paths, One Result”: A (Heavily Qualified) Defense of Consensus Constitutionalism, 89 Tex. L. Rev. 157 (2011).
-
Entrenching Good Government Reforms
August 19, 2026
Mark Tushnet, Entrenching Good Government Reforms, 34 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 873 (2011).
-
The Rights Revolution in the Twentieth Century
August 19, 2026
Mark Tushnet, The Rights Revolution in the Twentieth Century, in The Cambridge History of Law in America, v. 3, at 377 (Michael Grossberg & Christopher…
-
The United States of America
August 19, 2026
Mark Tushnet, The United States of America, in Judicial Activism in Common Law Supreme Courts 415 (Brice Dickson ed., 2007).
-
William Rehnquist’s Federalism
August 19, 2026
Mark Tushnet, William Rehnquist’s Federalism, in The Rehnquist Legacy 187 (Craig Bradley ed., 2006).
-
The United States: Eclecticism in the Service of Pragmatism
August 19, 2026
Mark Tushnet, The United States: Eclecticism in the Service of Pragmatism, in Interpreting Constitutions: A Comparative Study (Jeffrey Goldsworthy ed., 2006).
-
Mark Tushnet, The Supreme Court’s Two Principles of Equality: From Brown to 2003, in From the Grassroots to the Supreme Court: Brown v. Board of…
-
Some Reflections on Method in Comparative Constitutional Law
August 19, 2026
Mark Tushnet, Some Reflections on Method in Comparative Constitutional Law, in The Migration of Constitutional Ideas 67 (Sujit Choudhry ed., 2006).
-
Constitution of the United States, Amendments to the Constitution, and interpretation of the Constitution
August 19, 2026
Mark Tushnet, Constitution of the United States: Interpretation of the Constitution, in The Oxford International Encyclopedia of Legal History 160 (Stanley N. Katz ed., Oxford…
-
The Rise of the Weak-Form Judicial Review
August 19, 2026
Mark Tushnet, The Rise of the Weak-Form Judicial Review, in Comparative Constitutional Law 321 (Tom Ginsburg & Rosalind Dixon eds., Edward Elgar 2011).
-
Comparative Constitutional Federalism: Europe and America
August 19, 2026
Comparative Constitutional Federalism: Europe and America (Mark Tushnet ed., Greenwood Press 1990).
-
The Rights International Companion to Constitutional Law: An International Human Rights Law Supplement
August 19, 2026
Francisco Forrest Martin & Mark V. Tushnet, The Rights International Companion to Constitutional Law: An International Human Rights Law Supplement (Kluwer Law Int’l 1999).