Parent Categories
Civil Practice & Procedure
-
Can Simple Mechanism Design Results be Used to Implement the Proportionality Standard in Discovery?
June 4, 2025
Holger Spamann, Can Simple Mechanism Design Results be Used to Implement the Proportionality Standard in Discovery?: Comment, 172 J. Institutional & Theoretical Econ. 227 (2016).
-
Scott Lasensky, Gabriella Blum, Daniel Shapiro & Howard Raiffa, International Dimensions: What Is the Role of Third Parties?, 21 Negotiation J. 245 (2005).
-
Against Choice-of-Law Clauses
June 3, 2025
Joseph William Singer, Against Choice-of-Law Clauses, Willamette Law Review (forthcoming, 2025)…
-
Civil Conspiracy, Negligence, and Recklessness In Claims Against Manufacturers of Dangerous Products
May 31, 2025
John C. Goldberg & Benjamin C. Zipursky, Civil Conspiracy, Negligence, and Recklessness In Claims Against Manufacturers of Dangerous Products, 74 DePaul Law Review 193 (2025).
-
The Forgotten History of Metes and Bounds
May 28, 2025
Maureen E. Brady, The Forgotten History of Metes and Bounds, 128 Yale L.J. 872 (2019).
-
Andrew S. Gold & Henry E. Smith, Legal Concepts as a Deep Structure of the Law: Reinach’s A Priori in Action, in Reinach and the…
-
Turning Neighbors into Nuisances
May 22, 2025
Maureen E. Brady, Turning Neighbors into Nuisances, 134 Harv. L. Rev. 1609 (2021).
-
Saddam’s Folly: Playing Chicken With George Bush
May 21, 2025
Robert H. Mnookin & Richard Birke, Saddam’s Folly: Playing Chicken With George Bush, 8 Negot. J. 41 (1992).
-
Sheila Heen, Defining Gender Differences: Is the Proof in the Process, 12 Negot. J. 9 (1996).
-
Are Juries Less Erratic than Individuals? Deliberation, Polarization, and Punitive Damages
May 21, 2025
David Schkade, Cass R. Sunstein & Daniel Kahneman, Are Juries Less Erratic than Individuals? Deliberation, Polarization, and Punitive Damages (U. Chi. L. Sch., John M.
-
The Tension Between Empathy and Assertiveness
May 21, 2025
Robert H. Mnookin, Scott R. Peppet, Andrew S. Tulumello, The Tension Between Empathy and Assertiveness, 12 Negotiation J. 217 (1996).
-
Pennoyer Was Right
May 15, 2025
Stephen E. Sachs, Pennoyer Was Right, 95 Tex. L. Rev. 1249 (2017).
-
Law Matters — Less Than We Thought
May 14, 2025
Daniel M. Klerman & Holger Spamann, Law Matters — Less Than We Thought, J. L., Econ., & Org. (2022).
-
Invited Perspective: How Much Can Potential Jurors Tell Us about Liability for Medical AI?
May 10, 2025
W. Nicholson Price, Sara Gerke & I. Glenn Cohen, Invited Perspective: How Much Can Potential Jurors Tell Us about Liability for Medical AI?, J. Nuclear…
-
Tyler R. Giannini, Political Legitimacy and Private Governance of Human Rights: Community-Business Social Contracts and Constitutional Moments, in Human Rights, Democracy, and Legitimacy in a…
-
Online Kiobel Symposium: The Alien Tort Statute and the Importance of Historical Evidence
May 10, 2025
Tyler Giannini & Susan H. Farbstein, Online Kiobel Symposium: The Alien Tort Statute and the Importance of Historical Evidence, SCOTUS Blog (July 17, 2012, 7:14…
-
The Place of Philosophy in Private Law Scholarship
May 10, 2025
John C. P. Goldberg & Benjamin C. Zipursky, The Place of Philosophy in Private Law Scholarship, in Methodology in Private Law Theory: Between New Private…
-
W. Nicholson Price, Sara Gerke & I. Glenn Cohen, Potential Liability for Physicians Using Artificial Intelligence, 322 JAMA 1765 (2019).
-
Cass R. Sunstein, Does Evidence Matter? Originalism and the Separation of Powers, SSRN (2023).
-
Yeon-Koo Che & Kathryn E. Spier, Exploiting Plaintiffs Through Settlement: Divide and Conquer, 164 J. Inst. & Theoretical Econ. 4 (2008).
-
Benjamin C. Zipursky & John C. P. Goldberg, Recklessness in Tort: Interstitial Law as Doctrinal Fine-Tuning, in Interstitial Private Law (Samuel L. Bray, John C.P.