Jury Trials

Charles J. Ogletree, Jr., Foreword to Andrew Guthrie Ferguson, Why Jury Duty Matters: A Citizens Guide to Constitutional Action, at xi (2013).

Elizabeth Papp Kamali & Thomas A. Green, A Crossroads in Criminal Procedure: The Assumptions Underlying England’s Adoption of Trial by Jury for Crime, in Law…

Michael R. Dreeben, The Right to Present a Twinkie Defense, 9 Green Bag 2d 353 (Summer 2006).

Michael R. Dreeben, The Confrontation Clause, the Law of Unintended Consequences, and the Structure of Sixth Amendment Analysis, 34 Geo. L.J. Ann. Rev. Crim. Pro.

Alexandra Natapoff, Speechless: The Silencing of Criminal Defendants, 80 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1449 (2005).

Hon. Joseph A. Greenaway, Jr., The Evidence Rules Every New Trial Lawyer Should Know, Litig., Summer 2010, at 3.

Anna Lvovsky, The Province of the Jurist: Judicial Resistance to Expert Testimony on Eyewitnesses as Institutional Rivalry 126 Harv. L. Rev. 2381 (2013).

Cass R. Sunstein, Misery and Company, New Republic, Oct. 22, 2008, at 39 (reviewing Marc Sageman, Leaderless Jihad: Terror Networks in the Twenty-first Century (2008)).

Cass R. Sunstein, Group Polarization and 12 Angry Men, 23 Negotiation J. 443 (2007).

Cass R. Sunstein, Group Judgments: Statistical Means, Deliberation, and Information Markets, 80 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 962 (2005).

Cass R. Sunstein, Daniel Kahneman, David Schkade & Ilana Ritov, Predictably Incoherent Judgments, 54 Stan. L. Rev. 1153 (2002).

Ronald S. Sullivan, Jr., The Rittenhouse Trial: A Legal Scholar Responds, Quillette, Nov. 23, 2021.

Ronald Sullivan, Rittenhouse Verdict Flies in the Face of Legal Standards for Self-Defense, The Conversation (Nov. 19, 2021).

Randall L. Kennedy, No: Drawing Racial Lines Has a Toxic Effect On Society, 81 A.B.A. J. 37 (1995).

Randall Kennedy, The Justice System and Black America: After the Cheers, New Republic, Oct. 23, 1995, at 14.

Randall L. Kennedy, Reasonable v. Unreasonable Doubt, in Postmortem: The O.J. Simpson Case: Justice Confronts Race, Domestic Violence, Lawyers, Money, and the Media 33 (Jeffrey…

Michael J. Klarman, The Racial Origins of Modern Criminal Procedure, 99 Mich. L. Rev. 48 (2000).

Michael J. Klarman, Is the Supreme Court Sometimes Irrelevant? Race and the Southern Criminal Justice System in the 1940s, 89 J. Am. Hist. 119 (2002).

Mark Tushnet, Book Review, 76 Historian 606 (2014)(reviewing Dean A. Strang, Worse Than the Devil: Anarchists, Clarence Darrow & Justice in a Time of Terror…

Louis Kaplow, Note, The Theoretical Foundation of the Hearsay Rules, 93 Harv. L. Rev. 1786 (1980).

Louis Kaplow, Optimal Multistage Adjudication, 33 J.L. Econ. & Org. 613 (2017).

Jeannie Suk Gersen, The Vital Role of Bystanders in Convicting Derek Chauvin, NewYorker.com (Apr. 21, 2021).

Jeannie Suk Gersen, The Simple Facts of Derek Chauvin’s Trial, NewYorker.com (Apr. 10, 2021).

Jeannie Suk Gersen, Bill Cosby’s Crimes and the Impact of #MeToo on the American Legal System, NewYorker.com (Apr. 27, 2018, 12:50 PM).

Jeannie Suk Gersen, The Legal Meaning of the Cosby Mistrial, NewYorker.com (June 18, 2017).

Jeannie Suk, “The Look in His Eyes”: The Story of Rusk and Rape Reform, in Criminal Law Stories (Robert Weisberg & Donna Coker eds., Foundation…

Elizabeth Papp Kamali, Felony and the Guilty Mind in Medieval England (2019).

David W. Kennedy, Some Remarks About Trials, in Secret Agents: The Rosenberg Case, McCarthyism, and Fifties America 253 (Marjorie Garber & Rebecca L. Walkowitz eds.,…

David B. Wilkins, Straightjacketing Professionalism: A Comment on Russell, 95 Mich. L. Rev. 795 (1997).

Carol S. Steiker, Proposed Instruction, 3 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 276 (2001).

Carol S. Steiker, Sculpting the Shape of Nullification Through Jury Information and Instruction (response to Andrew Leipold), in Criminal Law Conversations 553 (Paul Robinson, Stephen…

Carol S. Steiker, Darrow’s Defense of Leopold and Loeb: The Seminal Sentencing of the Century, in Trial Stories 117 (Michael E. Tigar & Angela J.

Charles Nesson, What You Have Said in the Dark: The Evolution of Media in the Courtroom and the New Challenges of Containing the Jury’s Information…

Fern L. Nesson & Charles R. Nesson, The Confrontation Clause: Get Raleigh Right – Overrule Crawford (June 17, 2019).

Charles R. Nesson, JuryX: Deliberations for Social Change (EdX 2015).

Charles R. Nesson, Rationality, Presumptions, and Judicial Comment: A Response to Professor Allen, 94 Harv. L. Rev. 1574 (1981).

Charles J. Ogletree, Supreme Court Jury Discrimination Cases and State Court Compliance, Resistance, and Innovation, in Toward a Usable Past: Liberty under State Constitutions 339…

Charles J. Ogletree, Johnnie Cochran and Marcia Clark: Role Models?, in Postmortem: The O.J. Simpson Case: Justice Confronts Race, Domestic Violence, Lawyers, Money, and the…

Charles J. Ogletree, The Future of Defense Advocacy, 136 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1903 (1988).

Charles J. Ogletree, Arizona v. Fulminante: The Harms of Applying Harmless Error to Coerced Confessions, 105 Harv. L. Rev. 152 (1991).

Charles J. Ogletree, Just Say No!: A Proposal to Eliminate Racially Discriminatory Uses of Peremptory Challenges, 31 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 1099 (1994).

Charles Donahue, Jr., Biology and the Origins of the English Jury, 17 Law & Hist. Rev. 591 (1999).

Alan Dershowitz, Guilt by Accusation: The Challenge of Proving Innocence in the Age of #MeToo (2019).

Alan M. Dershowitz, Trump’s better Off Litigating than Testifying, USA Today, May 4, 2018, at A7.

Alan M. Dershowitz, America on Trial: Inside the Legal Battles That Transformed Our Nation (Warner Books 2004).

Alan M. Dershowitz, Reasonable Doubts: The Criminal Justice System and the O.J. Simpson Case (Simon & Schuster 1997).

Alan M. Dershowitz, Infinite Justice, 225 New Republic, Oct. 8, 2001, at 6.