Prerequisites: None

Exam Type: No Exam

This Reading Group explores the role of all state attorneys general as they deal with abortion, climate change and gun violence with an emphasis on the expansion of each state’s Unfair and Deceptive Practices Act.

The Court’s decision in Dobbs. v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization forced state attorneys general to reassess their responsibilities regarding reproductive rights. Dobbs has driven state attorneys general to decide how to best address the issue with health providers, local district attorneys and the federal government.

The Court’s decision in Loper Bright v. Raimondo and decisions of the Trump Administration has changed the way state government and attorneys general address their continued reliance on federal regulations.  Specific attention will be given to the “Major Question Doctrine.” The impact of Loper Bright and West Va. v EPA extends into core attorney general duties of health, consumer protection and education.

The Court’s decision in NYS Rifle and Pistol Assoc. v. Bruen struck down the New York City gun control statute and attorneys general are analyzing the best ways forward in the fight against gun violence. 

The class would involve an in depth review of Dobbs, Loper Bright, West Virginia and Bruen as well as discussions of the decisions of the Trump Administration. The class would also involve direct bipartisan virtual participation appearances of attorneys general and their senior staffs. Given the intensity of views on these issues care will be taken to assure balanced presentations and respectful class discussions.

Note: This reading group will meet on the following dates: TBD.