BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Harvard Law School//NONSGML Events//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
X-WR-CALNAME:Harvard Law School - Events
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://hls.harvard.edu/calendar/
X-WR-CALDESC:Harvard Law School - Events
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:20250820T1914Z-1755717265.1233-EO-717519-1@10.73.0.97
STATUS:CONFIRMED
DTSTAMP:20260508T104356Z
CREATED:20250818T140502Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260323T211528Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20251020T121500
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20251020T131500
SUMMARY: “What Do Universities Owe Jews under Title VI\, and Why?” with Rob
 ert Katz\, Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law
DESCRIPTION: What do universities owe Jews under Title VI of the Civil Righ
 ts Act of 1964? The answer depends on why Title VI protects Jews – that is\
 , its legal basis for doing so. Title VI prohibits universities from tolera
 ting discrimination “on the ground of race\, color\, and national origin.” 
 Notably\, Title VI –unlike Title VII—does […]
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html: <p>What do universities owe Jews under Title 
 VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964?  The answer depends on why Title VI pro
 tects Jews – that is\, its legal basis for doing so.  Title VI prohibits un
 iversities from tolerating discrimination “on the ground of race\, color\, 
 and national origin.”  Notably\, Title VI --unlike Title VII—does not addre
 ss discrimination based on “religion.”  Title VI’s disjunctive language inv
 ites interpreters to disaggregate Jewishness into “race” and “religion” and
  to extend the statute’s protections to Jews in their racial capacity but n
 ot their religious.  If this interpretive move succeeds\, universities migh
 t be permitted to address anti-Jewish discrimination only when motivated by
  racial antisemitism\, leaving them free to ignore such discrimination when
  motivated solely by religious antisemitism.<br />This disaggregative appro
 ach runs counter to strong precedent for the proposition that “Jewishness” 
 as such is a protected characteristic under federal anti-discrimination law
 . As applied to Jews\, the terms “race” and “religion” serve as statutory p
 laceholders for Jewishness\, which may be serviceably attached to either ca
 tegory\, or both. Moreover\, this approach is sociologically inaccurate: as
  an ethnoreligious phenomenon\, Jewishness cannot be meaningfully reduced t
 o either ethnicity or religion. Lastly\, there are good reasons to avoid ca
 tegorizing Jews as a “race” under Title VI\, as this risks reinforcing raci
 alized thinking about Jews in broader society. This is playing with fire.</
 p><p>Robert Katz's new casebook is "Antisemitism and the Law."  It serves a
 s a vital resource for understanding the legal history of antisemitism and 
 legal strategies to combat it. It explores how legal systems have been wiel
 ded both to oppress Jews and to fight antisemitism\, offering a global and 
 historical perspective on the intersection of law and antisemitism.</p>
LOCATION:WCC\; 3007 Room
GEO:0;0
ORGANIZER;CN="API User":MAILTO:api@law.harvard.edu
URL;VALUE=URI:https://hls.harvard.edu/events/antisemitism-and-the-law-2025-
 a-new-casebook-by-robert-katz/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/New_York
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
DTSTART:20250309T070000
TZNAME:EDT
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
END:VCALENDAR
